
Considering response options
I need to respond to a Chinese news headline regarding Portuguese football: “Watched 12 minutes VAR! Benfica president criticizes Sporting match referee: another scandal.” The user hasn't asked a specific question yet, so it’s best to seek clarification about what they want—whether it's a summary, background information, or specific details about the VAR delay. I should also provide some context about the rules and implications without adding any fabricated details. Keeping it concise and neutral is key here!Clarifying response approach
I should be cautious not to claim unknown facts. If the user wants more information, I can offer to look it up, keeping in mind we don't have network restrictions right now. I need to acknowledge the headline and ask what they’d like: a recap of the 12-minute VAR incident, an explanation of the VAR process, insights on its impact on the title race in Portugal, reactions from clubs/media, or a translation. It's important to provide neutral, concise information without any assumptions!

这是在说葡超德比里(本菲卡 vs 葡体)一次超长时间的 VAR 介入,本菲卡主席赛后怒批判罚“丑闻”。12 分钟的 VAR 极不常见,正常检查多在几十秒到 2 分钟内。

你想了解哪方面?我可以:

先给你个简短背景补充:

如果你要我做事件复盘或查证具体细节,直接说一声是否需要我联网检索,或给我比赛链接/片段。
